Saturday, August 3, 2013

Why the Plight of Animals is Ours


by Beatrice Victoria Ang

God’s original design was for humans and animals to eat green plants (Gen 1:29-30). But it wasn’t until after the great flood that God “gave” the animals for people to eat, too (Gen 9:3). A textual parallelism is at play—just as God commissioned Adam in the beginning, so now he commissions Noah. But the world Adam was to rule and subdue was a perfect one. Noah’s world—the world we live in today—is still steeped in sin.

To Adam, God said: “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground (Gen 1:28).”

To Noah, God said: “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth. The fear and dread of you will fall upon the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air, upon every creature that moves along the ground, and upon all the fish of the sea; they are given to your hands. Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it (Gen 9:1-3).”

The constant struggle between man and animals in a fallen world is a reality. We share a world; we fight over the same natural resources; the same rainforests and seas. Over the years, animals have been responsible for human deaths even as humans have been responsible for animal deaths. Some would have us believe that animals are “innocent” because they act on instinct and fight for survival. But God does not hold them guiltless when they kill, for He says to Noah, “And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of his fellow man (Gen 9:5).”

Having said that, the struggle between man and animal does not make them equal. Man has the greater responsibility. Made in the image of God, he has the capacity to care for God’s creation in a way that goes beyond instinct. A mother bear may do all she can to protect her cubs; a lioness hunt to feed her pride. But have you ever seen them appreciate butterflies? Or grieve for the orphans of their enemies? Birds cannot name animals or list down the differences between zebra and horse. Only human beings would appreciate the trick of the chameleon, cry for the abuse of animals not their kin, and feel burdened when beasts are driven from their homes or when there is threat of their extinction. A dog may allow a motherless kitten to nurse from her for a time, but can she give an organized and wide-ranging solution to the plight of the helpless? Would she even care? I think not.

Since God gave humans stewardship and the capacity to do great good, we are responsible for how we deal with animals even in this fallen world. We answer to God. “The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it (Ps. 24:1).” There are some things that God explicitly allows and some that the Bible is silent on. However, our treatment of animals where it is silent must still reflect the goodness and the character of God.

For instance, God explicitly allows us to eat animals. Genesis 9:3 affirms this. In the New Testament, Jesus declared all foods clean (Mark 7:18-19). But the focus of the permission is on eating, not on how animals are to be treated. If we think our stewardship is settled by the whole question of eating, we’ve got a serious problem.

Proverbs 12:10 (ESV) says, “Whoever is righteous has regard for the life of his beast, but the mercy of the wicked is cruel.” The righteous knows the value of life and would not kill even an animal unnecessarily. If you think about it, billions of animals die in slaughterhouses each year. Do we eat them all? Much meat is left to spoil, but poultry and cattle are bred in large numbers under terrible conditions for the sake of profit. Perhaps we are not guilty of this ourselves, but as Christians, we should care. It is not that everybody must become vegetarians; rather, we must get the awareness out so that irresponsible slaughterhouses and breeders can be shut down if they will not treat their animals with care.

How we treat our animals speaks volumes about us. If we put them in cages but treat them poorly, then we are showing we are greedy and care more for profit than for life. If we beat them or hurt them without good reason (i.e., for food) or provocation (i.e., when they’re attacking us), we show just how little we esteem God’s creation (and, therefore, God Himself). Animals have suffered a lot on human behalf (i.e., for the removal of sin,[1] for the advancement of medicine—thus, the saving of many human lives) and God allowed it because of His great love for us.

God considers human beings to be of greater value than animals. Jesus says in Matthew 6:26,
Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they?” And again in Luke 12:7, “You are worth more than many sparrows.” It is difficult to understand why God would love human beings so much in spite of the many atrocities they have perpetrated in the world, but we ought to remember that in the beginning, we were the crowning glory of God’s creation. And He has not given up on us. The day will still come, in Christ, when we will live up to the great potential for good God has intended for us. If we are grateful, we will begin by making sure we are taking care of His creation.

Question to Ponder:

1) In the Philippines, a chicken is sometimes beaten to death so that its blood will cling to the meat, creating a dish called pitpit. Since all foods are declared ‘clean,’ one is technically allowed to eat it. However, is it a practice we should encourage and continue? Do you think this is a question of eating or of animal abuse? Is there a difference between killing an animal and making it suffer before it dies?



[1] Regarding the time of Moses, it may appear incongruous that animals were sacrificed to the Lord even as compassion for animals was expected (Deut. 25:4). But this puzzle is easily solved when we realize the purpose of the sacrifices. Scripture says, “the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness (Heb 9:23).” Unless blood is shed, we will not realize the horror and tragedy of sin. The sacrifices reminded people of this. But before you argue with God and say that animals don’t deserve to die for the sake of people [and you are right; God knows that], remember that God Himself, more innocent than animals themselves ever could be, died for you and me. The blood of the Son of God is infinitely more precious, though it was shed only once, than the blood of a million goats and calves. It’s not fair; it’s grace.




14 comments:

  1. It's true that God has given us full authority over the animals but as we sense that they also have life so they feel pain and fear for death. It's not good to abuse them by giving long pain for death. Instead of giving long pain we can collect blood and cook together or mix with the meat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent work, Bea! I have hardly come across articles that argue this case and present it so clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. God can do anything He wants to accomplish His plan

    ReplyDelete
  4. If it is eaten out of physical need to maintain the health of the body and not out of desire or for selfish gain, then, I think it's ethically and morally right and ok to do so like the Bible says, "Everything is permissible but not everything is beneficial." God allowed it based on the motive and purpose of the person. I would like to suggest exactly like what the naturalist would have done to save a rare species. For example, if one wants to cut down a tree, he should plant 2 other more trees or even 5 more trees to conserve the number of trees in the future. We should take care of our property as a faithful steward and servant of God. Good writing!

    ReplyDelete
  5. If we cannot see the significance of an animal's life and suffering, then the significance of the sacrificial system on the Old Testament times could be devalued.
    But as for the preparation in terms to food. I'm not going to make this issue something essential for evangelism. All is permissible, but not all is beneficial. I don't think I would be technically sinning if I ate food like 'pitpit'. However I believe that it is best to kill the animal quickly without prolonging it's suffering to acknowledge and respect animals life and it's ability to feel pain and suffering. And that would result for a person to be more aware and sensitive to the life found in every created beings both animals and humans.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i am not so much familiar with so "inhumane" preparation of meat dishes but i would be more inclined to better practices of butchering animals. the idea of subduing the earth is to harness its potential for our own benefit. with God's image in our being, we should reflect the character of God in our exercise of dominion over the earth and every living thing in it. our attitude and practice toward animals and our environment reflects our stewardship and gratefulness to our God who gave them to us. so it's better to butcher them in a way that will not hurt them that much or would not cause much stress to those who will watch us butcher animals.

    ReplyDelete
  7. God may have given us the animals for consumption but this does not mean we should use them whatever way we want. There are definitely proper ways of taking care of them and even proper ways of killing them for food. Killing them for no good reason (e.g., as a leather) is definitely not the proper way. I really can't find a single significant benefit a person would have by owning a genuine leather bag. As for the preparation of pitpit, I feel that it is not a proper way of treating the chicken. Animals have brains too and can feel pain. How can people, even more Christians, be so cruel and not have a kind heart? We all know how physical pain feels like and if we could, we would want to not feel it ever again. This is why we all want to go to Heaven. This is the more reason why we should empathize with the animals we kill for food. Even though most of us are not the ones who kill them, we also bear the same guilt.

    ReplyDelete
  8. God gave the animal for the human to rule over it and in the same time to consume it too. But that does not means that human are to show the cruelty and brutality toward animals. If some body wants to consume the animals than they have a proper way of killing it so it should be done in a proper way not by the killing with lots of pains and difficulties. In the mean time we as human should also think how cruel we had became and how violent we had became because it all shows on how are we treating to some animals which cannot defend themselves and cannot go against us. So, when we want to consume the animal we need to kill it but don't kill will giving a lots of suffering and pains.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Raising awareness is a good idea, but it is not enough. If your conviction as a Christian is to protect animal rights you cannot be moderate about it. To allow some things to happen while trying to combat ideas in the similar vein, even just to support them by being seen eating animals whose condition before death was not known to you, as a person raising awareness, you will be open to questions such as why are you eating meat when it could have been potentially abused before being prepared. In short, being moderate about such things can ruin your credibility if your agenda is to raise awareness for your cause, in which case it is better not to eat meat at all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. God allowing us to eat animals does not give us the right to treat them cruelly. I believe that animals have feelings too and they have the capacity to care for other animals or even human beings. Having dogs at home who protect us and who are very loyal makes me want to turn vegetarian... :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, it is true that being a steward of God's creation we are responsible for taking care of the creation.
    the issue of eating animal beaten to death and eat it with blood is something I want to question. Is it permitted in the bible?
    The permission of eating all food is Mark 7:18-19 is a parenthetical note by the author, but in Acts early Church decided to abstain from eating "...strangled animals and from the blood".It was also not permitted to eat the blood of the animal in the bible as it has life in it,but now a days it is acceptable.
    Being steward shall we be also obeying the word of God without cultural preferences and norms?
    Thanks for bringing up such kind of issue in discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I also agree with this: "Much meat is left to spoil, but poultry and cattle are bred in large numbers under terrible conditions for the sake of profit...It is not that everybody must become vegetarians.." This issue is not just about the animals, but also about us taking care of our body because it's God's holy temple and because we are here as ministers. Animals which have been treated cruelly and have been forced to live in poor/stressful conditions are more often than not injected with something (e.g. female hormones and/or antibiotics) to ensure there's enough meat to eat and to ensure they look healthy and pretty, as opposed to free-range chickens which are naturally healthier. Now hormone residues increase our risk for cancer, etc. and generally, chemicals decrease our ability to function in tiptop shape, the shape that which God can maximize so we can work better for His kingdom in our workplace, school, and family, which are our first avenues for ministry. I think that the moment people realize this (self-benefitting part + your God's masterpiece) they'd be more willing to shift their choices for consumption.
    It's just like foie gras -http://www.onegreenplanet.org/news/win-no-repeal-of-california-foie-gras-ban/, and though I think that ensuring that we eat cruelty-free food as much as we can, though it might appear too legalistic for many, will allow us to live more fully. Because they're also a bit more expensive, we also have to rethink if we can do away with fast mass consumption and go with better-quality food and not eating in excess. After all, our choices of consumption (with consumption being the end of line in economic activity) will determine the supply. It is a question of both eating (firstly, as we dictate the demand) and of animal abuse (effect, because producers have to keep up with what we consume.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Forgot to mention: I just came across this site (I've only seen the last video, The Cove.) http://www.organicchristians.com/organic_videos.html
    Our professor also let us watch a documentary about the chickens we buy from the popular fast food chains - it's crazy how they grind the small male chicks in the factory just because they're pretty useless for consumption! (you can search for the keywords "small male chicks killed factory")

    ReplyDelete