Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Ordaining women for ministry by JB Sibomana

Ordaining women for ministry
1.      My own experience concerning the strength of women
I learned everything from my mother! She was the greatest person in the world and every time she was not at home, things were paralyzed. Nothing could function well especially in the area of taking care of the whole family when she is not around. She taught me how to love, how to be obedient, how to keep the hope burning for great things to happen. She always taught me that in life I have to be positive and always optimistic. Most of all, she pointed me to God telling me that I will overcome in life because God loves me! 
When my father was out there trying to provide for the family at the beach, my mother has always been selling fish to keep food on the table. When my father had no job, it was my mother who worked hard to provide by selling small fish in the market after getting the capital from someone else who requires it back with interest. As years advanced, my two sisters became adults and they made sure everything was doing well in our home even when my mother is not around. They are both married now and we always remember how good they were to us by taking care of the whole family: in cooking for us, gathering fire wood in the forest, fetching water in the river for everyone to use, cleaning the whole house, teaching the boys how to cook, and sometimes dividing tasks to everyone in the domestic duty.
Lastly, I have a wife now. It is chaotic every time she is not at home. If I did not get a first born daughter, who is almost eight years old to help in one way or another, it can be almost impossible for me to care for two young baby boys. From my mother, to my sisters, then my wife and my daughter, I see the strength of a woman in everyday life. They are just strong that is why God called them helpers. Nobody can help if he/she does not have extra strength to contribute in helping.
2.      How Jesus Christ treated women
The first thing I notice here is in John 2 in different verses. The first treatment we see Jesus portrays towards a woman is in verses 3 to 11 whereby we see Jesus obeying the suggestions of His mother. He never disobeyed her even publicly. It shows that He esteemed her so much. The second scenario is found in verse 12. Jesus could spend some time with his mother even at that advanced age she had. They walked together from Cana to Capernaum and never felt disturbed to walk with His mother.
Other places we see Jesus interacting with women is first of all found in John 4 with the Samaritan woman. Jesus never ignored to talk to her and wait on a man to come. He immediately approached her despite differences. To entertain a conversation with this woman signifies a lot of things and Jesus never rebuked or pushed her away. In Mathew 15, we see Jesus meeting another woman. After sometime of silence, Jesus decided to talk to her and congratulated her faith. In the same chapter, Jesus fed people and among them there were women: Jesus was willing to take care of women also just as He was taking care of men. This shows equality in terms of value for Jesus. Another woman came and poured expensive oil on Him and He commended her action and said that she will be talked about in all generations (John 12); there is also this woman with issue of blood that Jesus never refused to talk to (Mark 5:21-34); In verse 34, God calls this woman His daughter. It is a much esteemed name; Jesus wept with the sisters of Lazarus (John 11); Jesus responding to people who are talking about the womb that gave birth to Him (Luke 11:27-28). This shows how Jesus could entertain women even when they did address themselves to Him; He had to engage Himself in the conversation. In Luke 10:38-42, we see Jesus being received by Mary and Martha in their house. Jesus went on teaching them while one was busy to try to feed Jesus and the other was sitting at His feet. Jesus gave a comment saying that Mary has chosen well, a gift that she will not be taken from.
Not all the things we get in life will remain with us. Even when it comes to the ministry, position can be taken from us. A widow that gave what she had in the synagogue was much appreciated by Jesus to the point of giving a comment on her (Mark 12:41-44);   Allowing women to stay together with men for the coming of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1); Jesus giving a new name to a bent woman for 18 years (Luke 13). He called her “mother” in my mother tongue bible. Jesus never excluded women in different settings.
3.      How Paul treated women
There are many women who hosted Paul and others ministered to Paul in a very profound way in his missionary journeys. In his letters he used to recommend some of them (1 Corinthians 16:19; Romans 16, especially verse 13 where he mentions a certain woman to be like a mother to him).
4.      How did Paul say about women’s ministry
1 Corinthians 11 speaks of women always covering their heads in church; Galatians 3:28 Paul says that we are all one in Christ; Ephesians 5:22-33 Paul says of the duties for both women and men; Philippians 4:2-3 Paul requests to keep these women in ministry and help them; Colossians 3:18-19 Paul says that women are to obey and men to love; 1 Timothy 3 (especially verse 11: “women must likewise be dignified, not malicious gossips but temperate, faithful in all things”); and finally Titus 1 speaks of men and women.
 It seems Paul wanted women silent in church. Can that be a cultural issue? Is there any context for those passages? Are those passages meant to be for even now or just for that time? In any case, Paul likes to either talk about the current situation in his time or a certain truth that goes beyond time and culture. Would Paul be against ordaining women today? The answer can be “yes” or “no”! But I do not lose anything when women get ordained. I respect them and believe in the potential God put in them without man’s permission.

5.      How did Peter spoke about women and their ministry to God
1 Peter 3:1-7 speaks about men and women but especially the riches on a woman. It is found inside her not her outward appearance (verse 7 is the key; we are all heirs of God’s inheritance).
6.      The reason why women should be ordained

a.       Definition of ordination

This is an ecclesiastical Term that says much of consecrating (someone) as a priest, or a minister; it is to confer holy orders upon; It is also to appoint with authority in a way of establishing order that is supported by the power and authority given[1]. It is investing with someone ministerial or priestly authority. This is to be entrusted with God’s call to minister to the people and their God. Someone uses his/her gift to serve others while pleasing God. An ordained minister is someone who has been given authority to minister and serve God’s people while being used by the God of the people.
b.      Qualification for ordination
In the book of Titus and 1 or 2 Timothy, Paul speaks of some leaders who should be people that God entrusted them with a family and they are taking good care of their families first. There is a certain behavior that is expected to be seen in their lives. But those characters can be found to both genders and can be exhibited by both genders too.
c.       Examples of OT women workers
We have strong examples of women ministry especially: the ministry of Ruth to Naomi and Boaz (the book of Ruth), the ministry of Queen Esther to the Jews and at the palace (the book of Esther) and finally the ministry of Deborah in the book of Judges in the 4th and 5th chapter. These women were powerful in their office as ministers!
d.      Examples of NT women workers
When Jesus rose up from the dead, the first people to be in the tomb were women. Women were the first ones to be given the job of telling the rest of the people that Jesus Christ rose up from the dead. This great news, which is the foundation of the Christian faith, was entrusted to women before anyone else. Our faith could not have any foundation if it could not have been for these women who accepted to speak out this great news. I take it as a ministry that God gave them to evangelize and tell people that Jesus was not actually among the dead, but He was among the living.
Tabitha or Dorcas in the book of Acts 9:36-43 who ministered to widows in a mighty way to the point that when she was dead, widows wanted her back. Priscilla (as mentioned above) is also the most spoken by Paul because of what she did to him. These women were much spoken besides the mother of Jesus and her company.

e.       What to lose when ordaining women
We actually do not lose anything when women get ordained (given a position to serve God better and in authority). On the contrary, we allow women to make an impact and put into use their gifts. These are gifts that God gave them. Men are not the ones to give gifts to women. If they do not use them, God will ask them why. We cannot afford to have a ministry of hindering people to live for God and serve Him.
f.       What to gain when ordaining women
We gain another side of ministry that men do not have. Women get to put into practice their gifts. Women cab please God with the gifts that God gave them. Ordination comes with responsibility. Women become stewards of their gifts. We are able to put women in their place where God ordained them to be. There is always something g that someone has that is different from what we have or know.
Conclusion
There are two main things that allow women to be treated as men in different level of life responsibilities:
1.      Galatians 3:28 says that men and women are one in Christ. There is no distinction between man and women when it comes to the expectations of serving God in any capacity. In the same place, Paul says that even women are children of Abraham and equal heirs with the rest of the people according to the promise.
2.      It is believed that God created man in His own image (in the book of Genesis). This gives enough evidence that God decided to give His image to every human being and refuses any other animal or thing to possess His image.
Therefore, I respect and accept the people who would not ordain women. But for my opinion, I don’t mind if some of them are ordained because of their calling, faithfulness, proven and gifting. I would always sit under a woman’s teaching and get the message that God has for me. This position is not that I am right or wrong. It is just because I have nothing to lose when a woman is ordained.

Bribery: Making an Easy Way - Niraj Thapa


            All around the world today, bribery has been an easy way to make an impossible thing to be possible. Every day in our society, or in our individual life, or in our working places we are somewhat directly or indirectly witnessing this term. So what is Bribery? According to H. A. Hanke bribe is defined as, "Anything given to a person to  induce  him  to  do  something  illegal  or  wrong,  or  against  his wishes."[1] Hanke's definition implies that a bribe violates either a legal norm, a moral norm, or a norm of the person being bribed. American Jurisprudence offers a more technical definition of bribery as:

“the voluntary giving or receiving of anything of value in corrupt  payment  for  an  official  act  done  or  to  be  done with the corrupt intent to influence the action of a public official or  of any  other  person  professionally concerned with the administration of public affairs.”[2]

             Some people are already admitting that bribery has become a part of the system. With or without it a lot of work is going to be different. Now it has become a custom to give something in order to get your work done without any complication. And people are loving it because it is not giving you any hard time and the work is done without any hustle and losing your much of the time. It had become an easier way to finish your work with lesser effort and save your precious time. But in other hand the downside of it is corruption. People are getting corrupted more and more day by day. The whole system and in some cases whole country has became corrupt nation. There are negative effects of corruption which are: political instability, lesser authoritative government, and lesser involvement in development projects, increase in cost for goods and services, and no service for the people under poverty line. So, now what should be our response to this bribery and corruption and toward those who are involved in it?

            As a Christian, my response toward bribery and corruption is “SAY NO” to it. In the bible also it had mentioned that bribery corrupts our thinking and decisions. In Exodus 23:8 "You shall not take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the clear-sighted and subverts the cause of the just. And in Proverbs 15:27 it says, “He who profits illicitly troubles his own house, But he who hates bribes will live.” It is already mentioned clearly that we as a Christian should not be involved in any kind of receiving and giving of the bribery. In Hebrews 13:5-6 it is said that, “Make sure that your character is free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, "I will never desert you, nor will I ever forsake you." So that we confidently say, "The Lord is my helper, I will not be afraid. What will man do to me?" My action from giving and receiving bribe may seem like helping to me but it impacting my neighbors’ life. In Galatians 5:14 it is mentioned that, “For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." So in order to make our testimony good to share Christ also we need to be away from this kind of things. Though it may seems like it is hard to accomplish the work easily but if we faithfully pursue it with more strength and authoritative way than people will also leave/ give up on doing this. But to do this we need to take the first step so that others too can follow our footsteps.

And finally I will say that all of us need to witness Christ directly or indirectly so let’s see our works, “How are we witnessing Christ today through our work?”

Questions to interact:
1. Is bribery good or not? Is it a helpful medium for your work?
2. What is your view toward those who are receiving and giving bribe for their personal benefits?
3. What do you prefer in order to finish your job: "Bribe or A perfect work?



[1]H.  A.  Hanke, “Bribery,” in The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, 1975, 1:653.
[2] Max Koessler, ed. "Bribery," in American Jurisprudence, 2nd ed., 12:749.
[3] Langston, Richard L. Bribery and the Bible. Singapore: Campus Crusade Asia, 1991.
 
 

 

Sunday, August 10, 2014

To Cheat or to Repeat - Andrew Rota

http://www.juyofo.com/2010/10/9-ways-most-often-used-in-cheating.html 
      Most of the people I have asked so far have admitted to have cheated in high school or college. Alarmingly, some of them know of certain individuals who have cheated in exams even at post-graduate level.  The sadder part of this is all of them are Christians. I heard my brother once proudly announcing their motto back in college, “It is better to cheat than to repeat”. He is also a Christian.
     It would seem that many Christian students think there is nothing wrong with cheating in school. Maybe they think that since everyone is doing it then it should be normal for students. This reminds me of Galileo Galilei who was branded as heretic in early 1600’s because he believed that the earth was round at the time when everyone believed that the earth was flat. My point is, not because all of your classmates are doing it or your teachers ignore (even encourage) cheating then it is OK. In my elementary years, our teachers would repeatedly say “an honest centavo (P0.01) is better than a stolen peso (P1). I accepted their wisdom though I vividly remember cheating in an exam one day I after I was absent. I thought to myself, “I’m excuse from cheating because I did not know we will have an exam.” I repent because I can’t think of any reason to justify my cheating in a test.
     Is not cheating a form of lying and stealing? In consented cheating, we lie and take other people’s answers and copy them as our own. In unconsented cheating it is like stealing the answers of others and claiming them as your own. We all know that “not to lie” and “not to steal” are 2 of the 10 commandments. Jesus also taught against lying and stealing in different occasions of his ministry. Jesus added in Matt 5:13-16 when called His disciples to be “the light and salt of the earth”. Now if as “light and salt” we cheat in school together with non-believers then “how can they see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven?” (v16b).
     I think there are more disadvantages to cheating than advantages. The only advantage of cheating is you won’t fail that exam (given that you have a reliable source). However the disadvantages that I believe in cheating are several. One, you risk being humiliated and getting disciplinary action the moment you will be caught cheating. Second, you will tend to remember your lessons less if ever you really on cheating rather than studying well. Third, you are missing the important lesson of failing and taking responsibility. A mature person (especially Christian) takes the responsibility of his her actions. Whether the consequences are good or bad he/she must be will to accept the consequences and learn from them. Fourth, cheating in class could lead to more serious forms of cheating, lying and stealing later in life. Lastly, and the most important disadvantage of cheating is you are staining your own integrity before God and other believers. Nothing escapes God and I believe if we don’t avoid cheating early in life He would discipline us later to make us learn. Likewise, your testimony of cheating in class doesn’t compliment your testimony of your new life in Jesus. Cheating may make us pass an exam in class but it will make us fail the more important test in life.


Guide questions for reactions
1. What do your Christian friends think about cheating in school?
2.  Is there any justifiable reason to cheat in class?
3.  What do you when you see someone cheat in an exam but you also sometimes cheat during exams?

Saturday, August 9, 2014

Submit or Fight

Tual Lian Mung (Tin Lin)




Myanmar has many ethnic groups and the civil between the ethnic groups and government military has been going on since 1948 because the government wants to take control over ethnic groups and made much damage to them. Myanmar is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world with key non-Burman ethnic groups demanding equality with the Burmans in the three public realms, specifically the protection of ethnic culture, language, and religion freedom.[1]

“When government forces attacked Mansi township in the northern Kachin state on October 22 last year (properly in 2013), soldiers fired 60mm mortars at civilian homes for an hour before storming the village. Many of the thatched wooden buildings were burned to the ground.”[2]


Although there have undoubtedly been positive changes in Burma and the government has worked towards ceasefire agreements with organisations such as the Karen National Union (KNU), New Mon State Party (NMST), Chin National Front (CNF), and Arakan Liberation Party (ALP), conflicts have recently escalated in Kachin, Arakan and Shan States. The move to transform the bilateral ceasefire agreements into a nationwide ceasefire still remains unfulfilled. Furthermore, the Burmese army reportedly still continues to commit serious abuses against civilians as recently reported by local and international organisations such as ND-Burma, Physicians for Human Rights, and Human Rights Watch.[3]

Dictatorship like Burmese military regimes has become the modern fascist of the 21st century. The people of Burma have been totally controlled by the military junta with the ideology of totalitarianism. [4] Since the government took control over the country, they changed education system and economic system which brought poverty over millions of people. Education became the place where government’s philosophies are taught without having any quality. Large outlays of money have been spent on the military, while only meager funds have gone to education and health issues. The numbers of children who do not attend school or who have dropped out reportedly increased in the 1990s. According to World Bank estimates, only 46.9 percent of the secondary school-age children were enrolled in schools during 1995.[5]
Buddhism is announced as as the country's official religion and the right for other religions became limited and sometimes Christians are persecuted in some areas where the media can’t reach.[6] To respond to the government’s dictatorship, the ethnic groups have their own militaries to fight against the government. Among those ethnic groups against the government, there are some Christian groups who are also fighting against the government for their right.[7]


What does the Bible say?
There are many Bible verses which discuss about submitting to human authority. According to the Bible, it seems that all governments in any nation are appointed by God, particularly we can see it in Roman 13:1-2. It is very important to have the right Biblical principles  in order to respond to the human authority according to God’s will. Many Christian leaders in Myanmar seem to keep silent about political issues while others are struggling for human right. I would like to know your ideas and belief regarding Christian response to the abusive or corrupted government.

Biblical verses regarding Submission to human  authority
Romans 13:1-2
Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment.
1 Peter 2:13-14
Be subject for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good.
Matthew 22:21
They said, “Caesar's.” Then he said to them, “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.”

Questions for Comments                                                 
1.      Should we submit to every government, even to those who are abusing people with their power?
2.      What would you do if your people and family members were continually abused in many ways by your government?
3.      How Should Christians respond to dictatorial government?
4.      What is your view on Christian being armed to fight against the abusive government? (Should they or not, why)




[1] http://www.conflictmap.org/conflict/myanmar_rebels
[2] http://www.ucanews.com/news/kachin-war-of-independence-is-a-test-of-faith/70493
[3] http://www.burmalink.org/background/burma/dynamics-of-ethnic-conflict/overview/
[4] http://www.myanmartodaynews.com/2011/05/02/burmese-military-regimes-as-a-totalitarianism/
[5] http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/economies/Asia-and-the-Pacific/Burma-Myanmar-POVERTY-AND-WEALTH.html#ixzz39gqa2deK
[6] http://beginningandend.com/burma-passes-law-requiring-permit-read-bible/
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_conflict_in_Burma#cite_note-16

Friday, August 8, 2014

Is there a need of Inter-faith Dialogue in Mindanao?
 By: Christian Jay Tardo

The population of Mindanao is consisting of 24% of the Philippine population.[1] I was raised in Mindanao almost my entire life and I witness the war between tribes, religions and beliefs. In the midst of all of these, people are asking: How do we break and end this cycle? As the Church how can we contribute in breaking and ending this vicious cycle?
In my observation, “Interfaith dialogue” is one of the options that has not yet explored by the Churches in Mindanao. Interfaith dialogue is a cooperative, constructive and positive interaction between people of different religious traditions, either spiritual or humanistic beliefs, at the individual, communal and institutional levels. It involves and promotes understanding between different religions or beliefs to increase acceptance of others, rather than to create new beliefs.[2]  Or we can describe interfaith dialogue as:
  • DOES go beyond tolerance toward mutual respect.
  • Does NOT teaches that all religions are essentially the same.
  • DOES help people learn to lead in a pluralistic society.
  • Does NOT dilute or destroy religious convictions.
  • DOES invite everyone to be honest and open about their own beliefs, questions, and religious identity.
  • Does NOT provides an opportunity for religious groups to proselytize or impose their beliefs on others.
  • DOES focus on shared values and commitments to the common good of the people in the society.[3]

Advantages of Inter-faith dialogue
  • It cultivates people into a deeper sense of their own religious identity while building relationships with people who are different.
  • Equips people with skills to navigate in a religiously and culturally diverse world.
  • Helps people become more articulate about their own worldviews, beliefs, and values.
  • Develops a sense of mutual trust, respect, shared values, and understanding across religious traditions, thus reducing religiously motivated violence, stereotyping, bigotry, or hatred.
  • Unites people across faith and ideological lines with a shared commitment to nurturing the lives of young people.[4]
  •  
Challenges in Interfaith Dialogue in Mindanao
·         Churches and church leaders are not yet open for the idea of interfaith dialogue.
·         Lack of understand about inter-faith dialogue with other religions.
·         Churches and church leaders are lack of vision for the society; they just want to focus on the church and its business.
·         Fundamentalism is rampant among different religions.


The need of Inter-faith Dialogue in Mindanao

Mindanao is a place where several religions and beliefs are practice. Each one is exercising their freedom as citizen of the country. In my observation, there are 20% Muslims, 70% Christians, 10% other Religions. However, we cannot deny the fact that there are also a lot of extremist in their faith, for example the Muslims/Islam that is connected to the Abusayaf, BangsaMoro Freedom Fighters (BFF), Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), etc. The animist that is associated to the Ilaga, Anting-antingan, etc. The Socialist that is related to the National People’s Army, and even some armed Christian extremist that are willing to die and kill for the sake of their beliefs in some places in Cotabato. These religions and beliefs contributed to the socio-political-economic situation of Mindanao. However, there is big gap in understanding each religion and because of that there is no appreciation and acceptance. Instead, each religion is trying to dominate and oppress other religions. For example in Davao, wherein almost 80% are Christians[5], consider the Muslims as 2nd class citizen. On the other hand, in Maguindanao wherein 90% are Muslims[6], consider the Christian as 2nd class citizen. Most of the places in Mindanao are dominated by the Christians. However, the minority Muslims are controlling the majority due to the terroristic and violent threats. Can this vicious cycle end? Is there a hope for long lasting peace in Mindanao?

Conclusion
After considering the situation and the benefits of interfaith dialogue I do believe that there is greater need of Inter-Faith dialogue between religions and in my opinion it should be initiated by the Christian Churches and Organizations since majority of the population are Christians. On the other hand, I do acknowledge also the challenges and even the consequences of this idea. However, for a long lasting peace and development understanding each other and appreciation of diversified society is the key to move to that direction and Inter-faith dialogue contributes to that idea.

Questions to Consider:

1.      What do you think are the positive and negative consequences of this idea?
2.      How does inter-faith dialogue look like in your context?
3.      To those who oppose the idea of inter-faith dialogue, what could be the possible contribution/s of the church to the vicious cycle in Mindanao?




[1] http://www.census.gov.ph (Access Date: August 7, 2014)
[2] Musser, D & Sunderland, D., War or Words: Interreligious Dialogue as an Instrument of Peace The Pilgrim Press, Cleveland (2005).
[3] http://www.inspiredtoserve.org/interfaith (Access date: August 7, 2014).
[4] http://www.inspiredtoserve.org/interfaith (Access date: August 7, 2014).
[5] http://www.davaocity.gov.ph/davao/demography.aspx (Access Date: August 7, 2014).
[6] http://www.muslimmindanao.ph/Islam_phil2.html (Access Date: August 7, 2014).

Disciple Moderately

by Ago Maya, Jr.

“The world is becoming a single place.” This is how globalization has been seeing our life today. In a way, globalization is a ‘complex connectivity,’ which means the presence of rapidly developing network of “interconnections and interdependencies” of life. Such reality of globalization is observed in the locus of faith or religion, especially Christianity. Globalization is perceived to bring about that interconnectedness and interdependence traits of religious pluralism, which are both the accepted reality, likewise emerging ideology in our present world.
To fully harness this so considered a progress of globalization in religion – interrelatedness and interdependence - there raised the promotion of what is called “Moderation” ideology in religious circles.  This ideology began as simply part of the call of the former Muslim Prime Minister of Malaysia, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, to Christian denomination leaders during his plenary speech at the World Council of Churches conference in Kuala Lumpur on 2004. Now it has emerged as a very much adhered and growing movement pursued in many nations and very much supported mostly by non-Christian groups.
According to nations who believed to have been experiencing peace in the midst of religious pluralism, this moderation has always curbed extremism among religions for it has been guarding each religion from bigotry and hatred and each has been allowed the practice of the true teachings of each one’s respective religion. Former PM Badawi mentioned that some separatists practice their faith in absolutist terms that there is no more space for any compromise with others, and that the teachings they believe are being implemented in a totalitarian way. His urging and plead is that devotees of all faiths must be sincere in promoting the values of peace, of tolerance and of plurality in religion. In other words, for the sake of peace and harmony, ‘moderation’ must dominate over passion, devotion or dedication or faithfulness in religion. He ended his speech saying, “We cannot stand before a compassionate God while there is so much we have left undone because we are disunited. There is so much we could do, having received one another, to receive others [all other faiths].”

Imagine yourself having received an email from a non-Christian individual or may be a government official about such religious concern and humbly pleading you as a Christian leader to observe moderation. Because a response is being awaited, how would you reply expressing what you feel?
-        Do you see “moderation” as the balancer of interest for all faiths?
-        Are you in favor of providing a room for compromise in our passion to witness  for Christ and to obey the Great Commission in Matthew 28: 19-20 to make  disciples? If so, up to what extent you may possibly compromise and the  limitations of tolerance of other faiths?
-        How could or should a faithful Christian called urgently to make disciples of all    nations become moderate in obeying this considered to be a non-negotiable  mandate? 




Sources:

Enns, Paul. The Moody Handbook of Theology. Chicago: Moody Press, 1989.

Hunsberger, George R. Bearing the Witness of the Spirit - Lesslie Newbigins's Theology of Cultural Plurality. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998.

Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

Ott, Craig and Harold A. Netland. Globalizing Theology: Belief and Practice in an Era of World Christianity. Grand Rapis, Michigan: Baker Academics, 2006.