Thursday, July 11, 2013

"Is it alright to kill in order to save?"



Saturday, June 29, 2013
“Stem Cell Therapy” is in the news these days. It seems that there were some treatments that seem to be quite successful, while some, disastrously disappointing. Despite these negative developments, there are real medical advantages for venturing into these researches like potential treatments for incurable diseases such as cancers, leukemia, Parkinson’s disease and others.
There are two ways to harvest stem cell for treatment: the first source is “adult stem cells” – the source is from the person’s bone marrow, umbilical cord blood of newborn baby, or various organs in a person’s body. This is uncontroversial but not too effective. The second source, and creating quite a controversy, is “human embryos” when it is at 3-5 day of development. These are created through “Therapeutic cloning” and stem cells produced are more viable to treat incurable diseases. The controversy arises because, when these stem cells are harvested, the human embryos producing them would be destroyed. The issue is: “when is the right time to harvest stem cell from human embryos so that they can be safely considered a non-human being yet?” Does the embryo’s start being a person at the time of birth? When the fetus is capable of living outside the womb, which is about 24 weeks after pregnancy? When there is already a decisive brain activity, which is 45 days of pregnancy? When it is able to experience pain? When the mother feels movements in her womb? Or, as long as they are still microscopically minute and existing outside the womb due to “in vitro fertilization”?
So…..  when is it alright to use a human embryo for harvesting stem cell that would in the process destroy it? Or, is there really a right time at all for doing this?
My position in this ethical issue is: at the point of conception, the fetus has the potential to be a mature person. So it is therefore unacceptable to kill the human embryos in order to harvest the stem cells no matter how badly they are needed by ailing patients. Life is sacred and only God has the right to take it.
What is your position regarding this?
  
Note: The above information are from "Moral Choices: An Introduction to Ethics" by Scott B. Rae, Zondervan: Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1995. pp. 138-143
Posted by Ethical Issues at 5:21 AM http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Contraceptives: Is there any choice?



by Gulnaz Naushad

Biblical mandate for couple:
Many couples over the years have practiced contraceptives. Once a couple gets married they want to know which method is ethically in accord with the biblical teaching. However the question we fail to ask and answer before we talk about method is “what is God’s ideal plan for married couples?”
Samuel A. Owen in his book letting God plan your family shatters all our arguments we through, to prove that contraception is not outside of God’s will or is permissible. He believes that biblical ideal for contraception is that couples should not intentionally control conception through any means artificial or natural, and should not concerned about getting pregnant.
He argues that God created man and women with the gift of sex for two main purposes. 1)  to reproduce to advance His Lordship. Procreation is the primary purpose of marriage. 2) to have a union with each other and completeness of each individual. To fulfill these purposes he gave man and woman gift of sex which results in oneness and reproduction.
The origin of the contraception:
Those are basic guiding rules for us. This teaching seems hard to accept especially in our modern world where we have adapted a lifestyle which does not match with the idea of letting God plan our family. We can argue from many different angels but no biblical data seems to support contraception. One of the biggest reasons behind family planning has been the idea of over population. Christian also takes their stand by arguing that we have to be good stewards of this planet earth. But it does not mean we should stop bearing children. Samuel Owen also argues that we should be aware of the origin of the idea of contraception. It was started from the renaissance period as result of lost faith in God. Owen states that “if man is the highest form of being, the responsibility for life falls upon man’s shoulder” therefore people feel free to control life[i].  
How about some exception?  
However Owen also looks at the exception. He presents at least four types of scenarios which may deserve some exception. He argues since we live in this fallen world in some case we may not be able to practice the biblical ideal of procreation. We may have to practice contraception in order to preserve the sacredness of life and show love to God and other fellow men. Owen fails to give any example here which makes it hard to understand. But as a principle one may experience this in a number of ways.
Secondly a couple may control conception for some higher moral purposes especially relating to advancing God’s kingdom. Thirdly if there is a need to keep balance in marriage and sex. A couple may be struggling and their marriage life is at stake they may practice birth control to deepen their relationship. Since procreation and oneness both are the purpose of marriage, birth control can be practice to deepen their oneness. Fourthly parents are responsible for providing their children’s needs. If they cannot sufficiently they can practice birth control in order to obey God in raising godly children by providing all what they need.
Conclusion:
It is very clear from the biblical reaching that God’ ideal for marriage is bearing children as well as oneness between couples. We have developed a world view of those who have lost faith in God and where man has become the center. We should put God as a center of our marriages. However there are exceptions but as we consider those exception we have to do this prayerfully and with a great awe and sense of responsibility as we go against what is biblically ideal.    


[i]Source:  Owen Samuel A., Letting God plan your family, Crossway Books, Illinois. 1990. pg 17

Monday, July 8, 2013

Where Taxes Go: Housing the Poor

by Dags Miguel

Despite the recent improvements in the economy of the Philippines, the reality is that the country is still plagued with poverty. The government, foreign aid and even the private sector has long been trying to address the issue, and one of their known methods is resettlement and mass housing.
Photo Credit: focusonpoverty.org

Philippine Government's Plan on Resettlement
According to the website of the National Housing Authority (NHA), "The program, directed by the national leadership, involves relocation and resettlement of families residing in or along danger areas in Metro Manila particularly those along waterways such as creeks, rivers, and esteros. It is undertaken mainly through in-city multi-storey housing development utilizing government-owned land." President Aquino and the NHA plans to spend P50 Billion for 100,000 families until Aquino's final year in 2016. 

These plans have been underway since the start of Aquino's administration and have even been getting much attention from the press and social media. A report by GMA News posted this photo online regarding one of the projects of the NHA: 
Photo of a fully furnished unit for informal settlers at a relocation area in Balagtas, Bulacan. 
Photo Credit: Jun Veneracion from GMA News

According to reports, President Aquino and the NHA's plan is to specifically target urban poor families who have been living along the waterways in Metro Manila, in areas considered dangerous and critical areas for flooding and have them relocated in furnished homes (as seen in the picture above), families deeply affected each and every year during monsoon season. 

The photo reported by GMA News reflects the 4,500 units already built by the NHA in Bulacan. Plans of 3,500 units more are already in place in key Metro Manila cities for a total of 8,000 units. As described by the NHA, Instead of spending and allocating public resources for search and rescue and evacuation plans each and every year, the government has in turn focused to a much more improved resettlement and housing program. The President and even the NHA plans to offer P18,000 to 20,000 families located residing in critical flood prone areas for them to 1) temporarily find accommodation, and 2) to encourage them to finally depart from the said critical areas, all during a proposed 12-month period. In that same time, the government would resettle the families permanently as soon as projects like that in Bulacan are finalized and completed. 


The Public's Reaction
In response to the news, Filipinos turned to social media: facebook and twitter, to voice out their opinion regarding these developments. Here are a couple of reactions and comments on the photo posted by GMA News: 

  • "Yung tax ko napunta sa mga taong di nagbabayad ng tax." (My taxes are going to people who do not pay tax.) -Ma Niq
  • "Sana naging informal settler na lang ako." (I wish I became an informal settler.) -Dan Ramos
  • "This is what I call Social Injustice... Its either lupa mo ang pinag squattan then u cant just drive them away, ur oblige to provide a home for them or the government is forced to provode housing for non taxpayers? Paano naman kmi na below middle class at nagsusunog ng kilay pra mangupahan?" (So either they squat on your land and you can't drive them away... How about us below middle class trying to work hard for rent?) -Faye Mapoy

So it seems, justice doesn't reflect much for Filipinos who seem to feel that they strive and work hard day-in and out for their families welfare, only to see others get the "free pass", the benefit of taxation. The Filipino taxpayer is asking the government, is this the best way to address poverty? Are my taxes being allocated to the proper strategy? Should tax be budgeted in this manner of taking care of the poor? Is it right for the government to spend resources to people who "do not contribute to the growth of the economy"? Should taxes be allocated elsewhere instead? 


How Jesus Dealt with the Marginalized
So how did Christ himself deal with this issue? How did he relate with people deemed "outcasts" of society? What principles can be draw from his example and his teaching? For that, we look at an example from scripture

"Then Jesus said to his host, "When you give a luncheon or dinner, do not invite your friends, your brothers or relatives, or your rich neighbors; if you do, they may invite you back and so you will be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed. Although they cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous." -Luke 14:12-14 (NIV)


This is what Jesus expected from his followers. They were to do the socially unthinkable and be able to invite an outcast into their homes, at a most important social event in their society, Jesus wanted the privileged to look after the less fortunate. 


In another instance, he rebuked church leaders and the people in general by how he took action himself, being with the needy themselves, and not just simply teaching and preaching principles: 

“Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?” “No one, sir,” she said. “Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”" -John 8:2-11 (NIV)


This did not happen just once. This was how Jesus showed how he truly loved all people regardless of their background. Time and again, Jesus spent time talking to tax collectors, to adulterers and prostitutes, spent time conversing with them, eating with them and being with them (Luke 15:1-2; Luke 19:7; Matthew 9:10-11). He chose to love the seemingly unlovable, those rejected by society, those poorest of the poor both status and in moral standing, in order to give his followers an example to follow.


What You Can Do
So for us today, how can we help? How can we go beyond ourselves? 

1) Get to Know Them! Find an organization where intentional outreaches are being done to the marginalized and see how you can get to know them more intimately. Ever heard of Habitat for Humanity and Gawad Kalinga? Volunteer and see what you can do! Experience how it's like, hear their stories as you build side by side with men and women who are trying their best to help themselves out of poverty. 

2) Partner With Them! Support and help out organizations that give opportunities for the poor! Have you heard of Liberty Street Clothing? They're helping out survivors from challenging backgrounds through a sustainable business. Ask them how you can help them out! Check out their facebok: facebook.com/LibertyStreetClothing.



If housing is one way we can indirectly address poverty, then maybe we can make a much bigger step not just simply as taxpayers but as a compassionate people. Let us understand their situation and be with them, interact with them, to experience what it is like in their shoes. Then just maybe, we will all be able to fully grasp and understand and to make more sense ethically and morally what seems illogical and unthinkable. 



Reflection & Thoughts on the Matter

What do you personally feel about this issue? We would love to hear from you. Please share your thoughts on the matter by commenting on the "comments section" below. 


Sources: 

Sunday, July 7, 2013

The Rich Versus The Poor



by Joshua Miranda 
Once while in India I was telling a person about Christ, he asked me a question when the time had
come for him to accept or reject Christ as his savior; he said “If God is real how come some people are born in rich families and how come some are born in poor families that live on the street? Doesn’t God not care about His creatures?”  Like that person we are surrounded by people with questions concerning poverty. Who is to blame for such a situation that surrounds us, is its God, is it the government, is it the low paying jobs etc.

 In 2008 the average income in Mumbai was around 25 thousand a month, today this same average income is about 40-45 thousand a month. Anyone earning less than 20 thousand is put into the low income category. The high rate of real estate and utilities for the same puts the low income category folk from accessing the much needed resources such as a good education for one’s child, healthcare for each family member etc. 

“The rich and the poorer have a common bond, the Lord is the maker of them both” (Proverbs 22:2, Nasu). There are some who are born rich and are more fortunate with more opportunities and some who are poor and less fortunate with no opportunities at all. Sometimes there is corruption involved and at sometimes natural laws take over. If parents are prudent and wise, it will most likely also be that their children will all be prudent and wise. When children have rich parents they get a huge inheritance and do better in the world they live in. It really doesn’t matter if a person is educated or not in the final day when he stands before God only the opportunities he had will be judged. This is mentioned in Luke 16:10 (Nasu) “He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much.” It going to be all about how we used what we possessed. Also if a person is in a position to help a poor person and knows of someone like that who he can help and doesn’t do it he stands guilty before God. (Proverbs 3:27-28, James 4:17). God counts every opportunity we had even the place where were born is recorded “The LORD will count when He registers the peoples, "This one was born there."” (Psalm 87:6, NASU)

God when he entrusts a lot of riches to someone a lot is required of that person, if that person is to be a good steward for God. Even a person who is born poor can somehow think big and somehow achieve his goals by being smart, working hard and being persistent and following his passion (this is not always true but is possible). A poor person mostly hangs out with the wrong friends who teach him the wrong things. A person normally becomes the person they normally hangout with.

Many a times a person suffers due to lack of finances because in the days of plenty he doesn’t save for the times of need. We see an example of Joseph in Genesis, he is in charge of everything even
after facing a series of trials because he is relying on God all the way. The reason why Joseph is head over all Egypt is because he displays the wisdom of God when Pharaoh needed his dreams interpreted. Pharaoh has a couple of dreams in Genesis 41:17-24. Pharaoh is a person who is dependent on everyone else except God to interpret his dreams and no one in Pharaohs court can interpret those dreams. Joseph interprets the dreams of Pharaoh. Egypt in the seven years of harvest has to save for the seven years of famine that what Joseph interpreted of the Pharaohs dreams . This story is should remind each person that an economy can go up and can go down. Joseph knew that the economy of Egypt was up and told the Pharaoh that they should save 20% of all the produce of Egypt in the seven years of plenty that way when the years of famine came they would have enough food to survive on . In the midst of trials all the way to becoming prime minister Joseph relied on God and because he relied on God, God gave Joseph a formula to save. Save 20% of the income. And because Joseph used that formula Egypt prospered even in the days of famine. 


Causes & Results of Poverty
In the Biblical times someone without any material possessions was considered to be living in poverty. If you read scripture carefully it is clear that it was not God intention to for his people to live in poverty. In fact everyone who lived in poverty was to be treated with compassion. Some of the ways that caused people of the Bible to go to the extent of living in poverty were (1) Laziness/Inaction  (Proverbs 6:10-11; 10:4; 20:13; 24:33-34) (2) Discipline to work hard (Proverbs 13:18; 21:5) (3) A promise to someone that couldn’t be fulfilled (Proverbs 22:26:27) (4) Debt  (Matt. 18:23-25) (5) Not saving up for times of need(Luke 15:14). Poverty in the book of proverbs leads to ruin (10:15), shame (13:18), misery (31:7), crime (6:30; 30:8-9).[1]

Most of these examples bring us to the conclusion that it most likely the fault of someone that a particular family is poor today. It can also be that a person is born poor but can train their children to dream big and achieve those dreams. But poverty starts when children, parents or someone up the family tree decided that it was ok to live a certain lifestyle without any goals or determination or with a low self-image that plunged that family into poverty.

Reflection Question
Q. Why are some people rich while some are poor? Who is to blame for this?


[1]  Martin H. Manser, Dictionary of Bible Themes: The Accessible and Comprehensive Tool for Topical Studies (London: Martin Manser, 2009).

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Would the Christian Church Welcome a Prostitute?

by Jeevan Shrestha

Prostitution involves the selling and buying of sex. It involves an exchange of money for sex between a man and a woman who have no legal, moral or emotional attachment to each other.
Prostitution is often referred to as a “the world oldest and most disgraced profession.”  It is clearly evident in the Old Testament and New Testament era where it is regarded as a lowly and undesirable profession. Sex workers are condemned and stigmatized in antiquity and today. The Bible is generally against prostitution and treats the practice as the symbol of filthiness and unfaithfulness to God. 1 Corinthians 6:12-20 clearly mentions that prostitution is morally wrong in the eyes of God.  

However, Jesus was not judgmental in this. When questioned by those who condemned the woman caught in adultery as to whether she should be put to death, Jesus commented "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".  Jesus did not disregard her sin but he expected her to turn away from this sin without judging her. We may think that prostitutes are unacceptable to the church but they are still people loved by God.When speaking to those who refused to believe the truth about Himself, Jesus Christ said, "I tell you the truth, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you. For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him" (Matthew 21:31-32).

Why is prostitution so persistently present throughout history? Have we tried to look at the other side of the story? 

Prostitution is surely not a high noble calling. No woman who feels she really has a selection from which to freely choose, say, “I would like to be a prostitute”? The things we have heard girls say what they want to be when they grow up, surely we have never heard one, as a child or teen, say, “I want to be a prostitute”.  It is one of those bitter realities that we have to deal with in our imperfect world. Have we ever thought of why those women have chosen this life for themselves?  Have we tried to know how these women came from all different walks of life? 

The average, prostitute is drug-addicted, homeless, abused, extremely poor and living in fear. Prostitution demonstrates how horrible poverty is by driving God's beautiful children to a life of poverty and humiliation. For women who engage in prostitution it is their means of living. Most prostitute women do not have enough opportunity of education due to poverty. Many women who are in this occupation say that they decided to prostitute themselves to escape from poverty. There are some instances; young girls are working as strippers to pay off their school tuition. Some of them are single mothers, who need jobs. Hunger, one of the most fundamental human instincts, is a powerful motivator that forces to resort to extremely desperate measures in their struggle for life. Many of the women are the victim of sex trafficking where they are implanted to slavery. They are so dishonored and traumatized that they lives are torn. 

What is our responsibility as a Church? 

As a church we need to make an effort to know the problem from the root level so that we can liberate them from their former life and help them to heal from the things that get them into. Instead of overwhelming them with do’s and don'ts we must allow time or God to change them. Maybe slowly but God will change them. There are instances that they are even pushed to embrace their former lifestyle because of law teaching from the pulpit and the wrong attitude of the believers. They seek love and acceptance in church rather than feeling unwelcome at church. We need to discern the fact that it is our grace and love that they need and not the message of judgement that will push them back to their life. Sanctification is an inward work of God's Spirit. A truly sanctified life is a truly changed life by the Lord. Let our determination uphold the reputation of Jesus, and our love and encouragement rescues them from the flames. Forgiveness, restoration and honor—this is what Christ offers to the prostitute, provided she turns from her sin and trusts in his Son.

Your opinions !!!

  • How should the church respond to prostitution?
  • What if that porn star took ten years to be convicted by God, get baptized and leave porn?  What if she needed forgiveness every week?  Would we be able to tolerate her?
  • As a church how can we bring restoration to broken women who have been or are involved in prostitution?
  • Would you offer her a seat next to your family?
  • Do you think it would encourage her? That it would inspire or equip her in some way to change her current perspective or beliefs and work harder at clinging to Christ instead of her flesh and the world?


Work cited: