Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Totalitarian Governments

    

By Henry

Myanmar Military Government
 
Myanmar, known as “The Golden Land”, once the richest nation in South East Asia but now one of the poorest countries, used to be under the brutal ruling junta from 1962- until 2010. The country has been transforming into a democratic state after the 2010 election in spite of the ruling party is still controlled by the former military officers, who are now calling themselves a civilian government party. [1]
Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of independent’s father General Aung San, National League for Democracy leader, won more than 80% of the seats in Parliament in 1990 elections. However, themilitary government did not accept the election’s results and kept her under house arrest for almost 20 years. The totalitarian government
violated human rights on minority groups and others political cases in different ways that led Myanmar people’s ways of lives into misery, unsafe and scary situation. Millions of ethnic people groups fled into the neighbors’ countries as refugees to avoid the ruling junta’s political and judicial punishment and force labor.  
The United States of America, the European
Commission and the United Nations have all imposed sanctions against Myanmar though different mechanisms with the purpose of isolating the military regime in international community. The sanctions include an arms embargo, a ban on the travel of military officers, as well as their families and associates, restrictions on foreign investment, and the freezing of assets. [2]
The impact of the economic sanctions is controversial as restrictions in trade result in severe hardship which must be burdened by ordinary people rather than the targeted military regime and their associates. The most affected people were the basic female workers in the garment industry when foreign investment withdrew from the country. After sanctions were imposed by foreign powers, they became jobless and one opportunity was welcome to them, the sex industry.

Another impact of the sanctions has been the decline of the tourism industry. Many countries forbid their citizens to travel to Myanmar or to invest in the tourist sector as they believe most businesses are directly linked to the military government and their relatives. As a consequence, transportation workers, tourist guides, Myanmar traditional craft businesses, and the hotel industry have all been disenfranchised. Similarly, young entrepreneurs and educated people have had to give up their connections with the foreign investment and
international trade system. As a result, many have left their homes and communities to live and work abroad. [3] Millions of Myanmar people are spreading throughout all over the world to get the better jobs and support their families. Some are treated as a slave and other do not get the proper salaries in spite of they work hard from morning to until night. Who are responsible to protect the misery lives of these people and offer the better jobs in their own comfort zone and mother land with peace and comfortable lives?

                            The Biblical Point of View on the Government

Submission to the Authorities
Let’s see what the Bible says, “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do who will bring judgment on themselves (Romans 13:1-2)”.
            God, the supreme Sovereign, has ordained that there should be governing authorities. Every believer is to be subject to these various authorities, even if these authorities are evil as Nero (A.D.54-68), the emperor of Rome who cruelly persecuted Christians. When Paul wrote this letter, Hero was in power. Yet Paul exhorted the Roman believers to submit to Nero’s authority, because that authority was ordained by God Himself. [4]

To be considered:
1.      How would you respond Paul’s statement to submit yourselves to the governing authorities whether your government is good or bad?
2.      How would you figure out and correct in the biblical ways the government that violated human rights in these days?






[1] Phyu Kyi Khaing, “Peace and conflict monitor, Special Report II”, [Myanmar: Cause for cautious optimism] http://www.monitor.upeace.org/innerpg.cfm?id_article=879, [Accessed June 30, 2013]
[2] Phyu Kyi Khaing, “Peace and conflict monitor, Special Report II”, [Myanmar: Cause for cautious optimism]
[3] Ibid.
[4] Earl D. Radmacher, Th.D., Ronald B. Allen, Th.D., H, Wayne House, Th.D., J.D., Nelson’s NKJV Study Bible: New King James Version (A Division of Thomas Nelsons Publishers, 1997). 

15 comments:

  1. This has been also on my mind lately, as we struggle to make a living in our everyday lives, the government of our country is making our lives more and more difficult everyday. It makes us wonder as Christians how we are to submit to authorities like them. But God also reminded us with the story of Joseph the Dreamer, though he was sold by his brothers he was able to help his people and his family when God sent famine to the land. Maybe as we struggle every day, God prepares us for the day when we as Christians will be the ones to be on the position as leaders for our people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. According to my understanding Paul does not imply in these verses that God always approves the conduct of civil governments. Nor does Paul mean that is the Christian’s duty always to submit to them. The requirement of the government may at times be contrary to the law of God, and such circumstances the Christian is to obey God rather than men(Acts 4:1419; 5:29).
    Paul’s point is that the ruling power of human governments is entrusted to men by God, Their continuance in power, or their fall from authority, is in God’ hands. Therefore, the Christians will support the authority of the existing state. He should not presume to take it into his own hands to resist or to depose “the power that be.”
    Such instruction was especially needful in Paul’s day, for at that time the Jews were in a turbulent mood and had already stirred up rebellion in various parts of the Roman Empire. For Christians to reveal a similarly unsubsumissive spirit would have been to incur the same displeasure that was the beginning of the fall of the Jews. It would also have brought reproach upon the Christian church and its message of peace and brotherly love. Therefore, Paul elsewhere urges believers to pray for those in authority (ITim.2:1-2) and to obey them(Titus 3:1).
    I think as Christians this is what we should do to the existing state of Myanmar. Let us pray for them and when the time comes God will move everything into place. May God bless you brother.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A descriptive article on the current state of Myanmar both economically and politically from someone who has an intimate knowledge of its society and culture. You raise a very interesting question regarding governing authorities and a Christian's submission to it as part of God's commandment. It reminded me of 1 Samuel 8 where the people of Israel demanded a king from Samuel like other nations to judge over them. The Lord said to Samuel, "Listen to the voice of the people in regard to all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me from being king over them." The Lord told Samuel to listen to their voice but to also warn them and tell them the procedure of the king who will reign over them.
    “This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights:
    He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots.
    Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots.
    He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers.
    He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants.
    He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants.
    Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle and donkeys he will take for his own use.
    He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves.
    When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.”

    I believe this reflects man's inherent nature to rebel against God and to seek our own way versus seeking God's way. God warns us of such actions and like the Israelites we did not listen. Thus this is the result of sin, the rebellion against God's ruling.
    Yet God calls us to submit to ruling governments to an extent; like what Christ said, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's. (Matthew 22:21) in this case the payment of taxes but it also includes consideration of God's own laws and commandments.
    We are only to follow the laws of the land only if it does not contradict against the laws and commandments set by God. Like the Scholar Daniel who continued to pray to God even though it was decreed by the king himself that no one should pray to any god or human except himself. (Daniel 6:10-12) Daniel risked his own life to put God above law or king. So should we as Christians!

    ReplyDelete
  4. In their reply that they would obey God rather than men, John and Peter submitted to the authority of God but they were in no wise submitted to the government. they disobeyed but they did not resisted in the stipulation involved. they did not fought with the soldiers when they were beaten. civil disobedience involves disobedience of ungodly laws but it also includes willingness to suffer the consequence. this is the tipping point of civil obedience and disobedience.

    ReplyDelete
  5. this reminds me of my country. i have read and heard many stories about Christians struggling with the government. one of the question is "to what extent, should we submit to the authorities?" of course, we have to show our respect and reverence to our authorities undoubtedly, do we have to do whatever they ask us to do? i am doubting about it. thanks for your sharing, good reminders to me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for that honest and sad description of what is happening in Myanmar. My heart goes out to the people who are suffering under direct oppression. Personally, I believe that as followers of Jesus though we are called to respect authority, we are also called to be the ones who question, protest, stand against and fight for justice since the one we believe in is himself both just and fair. Jesus exemplifies this truly and boldly in a number of instances as written in the gospels. As followers of Jesus and as human ourselves, I believe that we are called to respect all people (irrespective of who they are and in what position)because they too are human and created by God. However, I think we must stand against all atrocities committed against the innocent in the name of authority, power or government if we want to be true to the teachings of Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe that we are to submit ourselves to the laws of a government even an evil one as long as it agrees with the general biblical laws (sanctity of life, human rights, etc...) But a law does not agree with the Scripture, we are to submit to the Supreme authority of God.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I believe that nothing is above God's authority. Even Paul was not obeying the authority when it came to sharing the gospel. If he obeyed the authority, he would stop sharing the gospel and might not be in prison. So my statement is that we can respect the government but we need to obey God's command more. For Myanmar government, we can submit to their leadership but we also need to address the corruption as believers because Jesus addressed the wrong leading of religious leaders who led people in the wrong way. Therefore we must not keep silent when our country men and women are being oppressed by corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As a citizen he/she needs to submit to the law of government if government and the law are submitted to God. For me i can't submit if government does not have laws according to biblical laws. If there are corruptions and abuses in the government we need to speak against it. We are representative of God to make free from the bondage and slavery of people.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Being against to human rights is against to God's will-filled human creation. Such is being contrasted by the government, not by system but by selfish, defensive attitudes and the brutal actions towards the people who looked for the right one-democracy, is the very primary fact that causes the misery, scary situation and others. It does not merely destroys rights but buried it into cemetery in spite of being alive, is to be resurrected today.

    In terms of submitting to this, what Paul suggested may be the government that is a nation-given one, which is subject to God's will into existence, no abuse in exercises in practice unlike Nero and is also the very thing that the nation would choose to give authority to it reflected back to its own. Whether good or bad is not the thing that will make people do submission but rather the nation can submit itself to such government knowing it is according to the realization that God is the source-authority above. However, Paul here exhorted that Christian is yet to be submitted to that for the growth in faith so as the kingdom to be built on earth. This does not mean the submission to bad or good authority but submission for being Christian to it for growth.

    Human rights is human value. To correct such governing authority requires a basic understanding that God created man of freedom, of His own from the very beginning; and that the value is bestowed with the ability to exercise it in practice, that equalness is of God to human in dignity.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It has been a struggle for me whether I should still submit to my government when I know they violate human rights. In my opinion, I would choose to trust in God's sovereignty. I believe that he is in control in my life as well as in the government. He knows what is best for my life and the lives of my people. Therefore, my job is to obey God by submitting to the government.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Your paper shot to my heart and I am thinking what Paul' s submission but for me, from today issues: what is human right, we are not fighting against their authors but we are fighting our human right and freedom. Paul with all his might he claim for freedom, throughout his life for this he died. I believe
    Ur paper very critical

    ReplyDelete
  13. Submission to authority, when legitimate and just, is not an issue.
    Submission to authority, illegitimate(eg. military coup) but one that rules justly, may not be so difficult.
    The problem is when the authority is neither legitimate nor just.

    I am not incline to accept that submission to governing authority is to do whatever the authority demands of us. We have to pay taxes to Caesar certainly, but we also have to give to God what belongs to God!! Their is, I believe, a delicate border between the two which, sadly, can be confusing at times.
    Our blessed Lord and great missionary Paul submitted themselves to the authority of their time, but they never ever compromise what they believed and stood for; their death is a glaring evidence to it.
    To vent my opinion, we not only have the right, but the duty to fight oppressors - but always with the weapon employed by Jesus himself, sacrificial love.

    Gandhi's freedom movement in India,
    Martin Luther King Jr's struggle for racial equality in America,
    Nelson Mandela's fight against apartheid in South Africa,
    Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's peaceful insistence for democracy in Myanmar are just few shining examples.

    “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
    because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor.
    He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives
    and recovering of sight to the blind,
    to set at liberty those who are oppressed" (Luke 4:18).

    If this be the master's stand, can the servant be far behind ?

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lun Khai:

    OBEYING and KOWTOWING is, by essence and degree, different.

    As a matter of fact, Paul is advocating this in a particular context here. The very reason why Paul counseled the Roman Christians to obey the authorities (government officials) is that some groups, including Jews, in the capital Rome, were activating some kind of sedition not to pay taxes to the government around this time (referring to vv. 6, 7) due to particular reasons, because it is part of civilians’ obligation to be in subjection to the authorities of the state (as in vv. 1, 5).

    Paul, for most of his initial ministry, benefited from the legal protection of the Roman Empire. The first Christian generation still enjoyed freedom of worship and legitimate religious protection. But later on down the line, emperors like Nero started to turn on Christians like anything, arresting them and putting them in lion dens. And probably Paul was one of those that were persecuted by Nero-led nationwide persecution. So it’s incredibly stunning to know that Paul, despite his bitter experiences, still advised them to obey the government. Yet the advocacy here in this text can boil down to paying taxes, custom, honor, and other obligations. It’s noteworthy that Paul himself, however, never ceased to spread the gospel; instead, he was always on the go about it although any propagation of Christian beliefs was prohibited since he knew it was mandated by Jesus who is above all these earthly authorities.

    As in Myanmar case, to be honest, I don’t have any categorical answer to offer in explicit words here. And it’s something out of my reach to touch the political points and measures. There are some Christian politicians (even some Theologians) who have claimed that if we want to truly apply the biblical teachings in Myanmar, we should do politics first. I don’t actually know how far they can be right if measured by biblical teachings and theological premises. One thing to consider is what Paul teaches us when he says every ruler is established by God and is therefore God’s servant indirectly or unconsciously (vv. 4, 6). We should obey them not just because we are afraid of punishment, but also because we recognize that God stands behind them and we know in our conscience it’s not right and proper to disobey them (v. 5). As I understand, Paul’s demand of civil SUBMISSION to government is RECOGNITION of their rightful place in the hierarchy constituted by God where He is at the pinnacle (v. 1). If, therefore, government seizes God’s place and misuses its power and rights CONTRARY TO our ultimate Master, we are obliged to STOP OBEYING and VOICE the truth and our rights. As in Myanmar case, as far well as proved by the Bible and allowed by our doctrinal teachings of the church, it is legitimate to raise our voice to call for the truth and our right in a parameter of legal processes permitted by the state laws. I would say, let’s let bygones be bygones as we can now see the beautiful glimpse of the future security and prosperity of the nation. For political means, we Christians should not get involved ourselves but support the activists by voting for them, by educating people, and by praying for their endeavors, since there are political parties that have been working on leading our nation to the path of democracy.

    Putting all into a nutshell, the best reading of this 13:1-7 is to view it as a general statement about how we Christian are obliged to relate to our governments in pursuant to the state laws as a nation.

    ReplyDelete